Now Reading:
Cryptocurrencies like bitcoin cannot replace money
Full Article 4 minutes read

Cryptocurrencies like bitcoin cannot replace money

Cryptocurrency devotees have a dream that one day humanity will be free from the yoke of money issued and control by governments through central banks. But the central bank for central banks has hit back to tell them they’re dreaming.

The venerable Bank for International Settlements, a 90-year-old institution based in Switzerland, has issued a research report concluding that cryptocurrencies are afflicted with inherent contradictions that make their widespread use as money impossible.


First of all, one has to understand what money is.

It is a unit of account that allows us to compare the prices of different goods and services; a medium of exchange that allows us to buy and sell these without having to organise swaps; and, finally, a store of value that allows us to save to buy things in the future.

For all three of those functions, it is desirable that money is stable  that its value doesn’t fluctuate wildly over short periods.

This hasn’t always been the case for many forms of money, as the BIS acknowledges. “Sustained episodes of stable money are historically much more of an exception than the norm,” the BIS reported noted. “In fact, trust has failed so frequently that history is a graveyard of currencies.” However, while it may be institutionally biased, the BIS found there is one model that does generally ensure monetary stability. “The tried, trusted and resilient way to provide confidence in money in modern times is the independent central bank.”


Cryptocurrencies fail the test of stability

This is the first fundamental contradiction of cryptocurrencies most of them generate trust by limiting the amount of currency available, in the case of bitcoin to 21 million. The problem with that is that during periods where there is greater demand for them, the supply is unable to respond. This is theoretically a good feature for the store of value function of money, as your savings theoretically cannot be debased by creating more of the currency.

But it’s not so good for the stability required for price comparisons or making transactions.

And it can backfire too for those trying to store value  just as there is no central bank to put downward pressure on the value of money, there’s also no institution there to absorb potential losses and prop up the value of cryptocurrencies in times of crisis.
$57 to buy a cup of coffee The second contradiction is that the very thing that gives money legitimacy  widespread acceptance and use  causes cryptocurrency transactions to become slower and more expensive.

“Money has value because it has users, we use it as money,” explained the BIS’s head of research Hyun Song Shin in a video. “Without users it would simply be a worthless token and that’s true whether it’s a piece of paper with a face on it or a digital token.
When demand for cryptocurrencies spikes, the cost of transactions increases dramatically as miners charge more for verifying them through the blockchains. “If you bought a $2 coffee with bitcoin you would have had to pay $57 to make that transaction go through.” But surely you can ramp up the system’s ability to handle transactions? Yes, but there are three fundamental limitations.

“If you increase the capacity to the extent that it becomes costless to use the system, this will drive away the miners because there’s no fees being paid,” Mr Shin observed. Cryptocurrencies ‘become an environmental disaster’ The second problem is the amount of data that needs to be both stored and transmitted to verify the blockchains in a distributed ledger handling millions of transactions a day. “With every transaction adding a few hundred bytes, the ledger grows substantially over time. For example, at the time of writing, the bitcoin blockchain was growing at around 50 GB per year and stood at roughly 170 GB,” the report noted.

To handle the volume of transactions that go through major global payment networks like Visa, Mastercard or Paypal, you would quickly need banks of servers to store the data. But the problem worsens when you consider that this information must be shared each time a new transaction has to be added to the chain. “Only supercomputers could keep up with verification of the incoming transactions,” the report warned.

Input your search keywords and press Enter.